Legal Opinion

Moore v. Parole Board

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1967No. Calendar 3, Docket 51,607PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

(for reversal). Plaintiff, by original action, sought from the Court of Appeals its writ of mandamus to compel the Michigan parole board to assume jurisdiction ovér him for the purpose of considering his entitlement to release from imprisonment on parole. Upon plaintiff’s application to review denial of the writ by the Court of Appeals (Moore v. Parole Board, 4 Mich App 261), we granted leave to appeal.

Moore, without the assistance of counsel, pled guilty to first-degree murder in 1938 and was convicted and sentenced therefor to life imprisonment in solitary confinement at hard labor as…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Moore v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. People v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  4. People v. FarrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. People v. HarrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. ColesMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Henry Hill v. Rick SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. People v. EaregoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People of Michigan v. William Lawrence RuckerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Oakland County Prosecuting Attorney v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1981

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API