Legal Opinion

Pratt v. Canfield

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1877PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Linn Circuit Court<

1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.

The plaintiff, Pratt, sued the defendant in the Common Pleas Court'of Linn county, to enforce the specific performance of a contract between the parties, by which plaintiff’ sold and defendant purchased the n w qr. of section 14, township 57 of range 21, in Linn county, Missouri.

The contract was .in writing. The price agreed upon was $1,280, to be paid in three payments, the first of which •$640, was to be made on the 1st day of January, 1871, and the balance in two equal annual payments, one on the 1st day of April, 1872, and the other on the 1st day of April, 1873, both to bear interest…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jackson ex dem. Livingston v. WalkerNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  2. Neilson v. County of CharitonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  3. Jackson ex dem. Brown v. AyersNew York Supreme Court · 1817

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mabary v. DollarhideSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  2. Central Pac. Ry. Co. v. TarpeyUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Anderson v. McCormickOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Pershing v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  5. Bessler v. Powder River Gold Dredg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API