George v. Chicago Transit Authority
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simon
The plaintiff, Ellen George, sued to recover both compensatory and punitive damages for injuries she suffered as a passenger in a train operated by the defendant, Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), which collided with another train. The CTA has acknowledged the plaintiffs right to recover compensatory damages but contests her right to recover punitive damages. The circuit court denied the CTA’s motion to strike the count of the complaint seeking punitive damages, and this court allowed the CTA’s application for leave to appeal from that interlocutory order. At issue is whether the CTA is liable…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Mattyasovszky v. West Towns Bus Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Kinnare v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Chappell v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Town of Waltham v. KemperIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- City of Gladewater v. PikeTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Jensen v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Bilyk v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Holda v. County of KaneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.