Motz v. Motz
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
UHLENHOPP, Justice.
This unusual appeal involves an endeav- or by a party who was defeated in a prior divorce suit to have the decree in that suit declared void on the ground the parties to that suit were never married to each other.
According to the allegations of his present petition, in 1939 plaintiff-appellant A. Clarence Motz (Motz) married a woman named Therese, in 1962 he married a woman named Keith (defendant-appellee here), in 1966 he and Keith separated, in 1968 Therese divorced him in Illinois, and in 1969 Keith divorced him in Iowa. See Motz v. Motz, 179 N.W.2d 367 (Iowa). He claims…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Des Moines Union Railway Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- McCarthy Co. v. Dubuque District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Brown v. Iowa Legion of HonorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Barry v. MulhallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Loose v. CooperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rush v. Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- In the Interest of K.N.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Teleconnect Co. v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- Crouch v. RandolphSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- In Re KNSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.