Crouch v. Randolph
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
MASON, Justice.
This is an appeal by Harold Randolph, defendant and cross-petitioner, from an order of the trial court denying his motion for continuance seeking retention of the case on the docket to avoid dismissal for want of prosecution.
A. B. Crouch and Robert Taylor, both licensed attorneys at law, instituted a law action to recover from defendant Howard Randolph, father by adoption of two minor daughters, for legal services and counseling purportedly furnished the two minor girls.
In the early part of 1965 Crouch and the law firm he was then associated with had represented Lillian…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rath v. SholtySupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Semler v. OertwigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- McKinney v. HirstineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Schmidt v. AbbottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Seela v. HayeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Glenn v. Farmland Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984