Legal Opinion
Fried v. Singer
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 9, 1922PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
The plaintiff and the defendant executed an agree*530ment in writing under which the defendant (who was engaged in the theatrical business) was to employ the plaintiff (an actor) for the season of 1919-1920, which it could have been found, consisted of not less than forty successive weeks.
Paragraph “Second: (a)” of the agreement is as follows: “The Artist [the plaintiff] agrees to render his exclusive services to the Producer [the defendant] for all performances in each week in which he shall be required to appear and that may be lawfully given, and the Artist stipulates that such services shall…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marsch v. Southern New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Barker v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Lee v. Prudential Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Fondi v. Boston Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Ballard v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Weinstein v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Rooney v. WeeksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Aisenberg v. Royal InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Stevens v. G. L. Rugo & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
- Stevens v. G. L. Rugo & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954