Legal Opinion
The Oregon
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 6, 1925No. 271PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The fundamental truth in this case is that both parties have, and had when they submitted their differences to the court below, unassailably established maritime liens. Each of them filed the usual libel, asserting lien under the Merchant Marine Act 1920 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, §§ 8146¼-8146¼t). In each case the owner of the Oregon, not only made no defense, but affirmatively declared the truth of the libel. Such proceedings conclusively established both liens. The Ruth E. Merrill (C. C. A.) 286 F. 355, citing and approving The Water Witch (C. C.) 44 F.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bailey v. SundbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1892
- Bourdon v. The Proceeds of the GratitudeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1890
- The CartonaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- The Hattie ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Carpenter v. Tietjen & Lang Dry Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Merchants & Marine Bank v. The Fishing Vessel T. E. Welles, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Seattle-First National Bank v. O/S MADRONADistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1975
- The R. C. ReynoldsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1927
- American S. S. Co. v. Hand & Johnson Tug LineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1927