Legal Opinion
The Cartona
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 3, 1924No. 261PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOUGH, Circuit Judge.
This suit in rem was brought to enforce a conventional lien — one existing by an express written hypothecation of the vessel, executed by the owner. - As, to the validity of this document, or its effect as against other lienors, we do not find it necessary to express opinion, because we feel sure that the parties intervening, who by their appeal seek to present that question, have no right so to do. Libelant filed a libel correct in form and seized the vessel. The owner appeared, claimed, and gave stipulation for value. No *828answer was ever filed; peremptory exceptions to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Atlantic Trust Co. v. The VigilanciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
- The Two MarysDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1882
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cactus Pipe & Supply Co. v. M/V MontmartreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- International Marine Towing, Inc. v. Southern Leasing Partners, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- The LydiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Cactus Pipe & Supply Co., Inc., Cross-Appellee v. M/v Montmartre, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc., Orient Leasing Co., Ltd., Cross v. Corinth Pipeworks, S.A., Cross Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Berwind-White Coal Mining Co. v. Robinson Shipping Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.