Legal Opinion

Wayne Health & Accident Insurance v. Werkman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1917No. 23,268PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Wells Circuit Court; William H. Eichhorn, Judge. Action by Elizabeth Werkman against the Wayne Health and Accident Insurance Company. From a judgment for plaintiff,' the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of appellee ’for $500 on a complaint based on a policy of insurance issued to Ernest D. Werkman in favor of appellee, his mother. The only question attempted to be presented is the ruling of the court on the motion for a new trial. Only one of the grounds for a new trial is insisted upon by appellants — that is the giving by the court of instruction No. 4 asked by appellee.

Appellant has failed to set out in its brief in narra*602tive form, or in any other manner, any of the evidence introduced in the trial of the cause, as required by the fifth clause of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HayesIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Farmers' Mutual Telephone Co. v. DuncanIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Reister v. BruningIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kirmse v. Chicago, Terre Haute & Southeastern Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Farmers' Mutual Telephone Co. v. DuncanIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  3. State ex rel. Fenstermacher v. McNelisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API