Reister v. Bruning
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Superior Court of Vanderburgh County; Alexander Gilchrist, Judge. Action by Louisa E. Bruning against William Reister. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLairy, P. J.
— This was an action for money had and received, brought by appellee against appellant. The issues formed were tried by a jury and a verdict returned in favor of appellee, upon which the court rendered a judgment in her favor.
1. The first error assigned is that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaint, omitting the formal parts, is as follows: “Plaintiff, Louisa E. Bruning, complains of defendant, William Reister, and for cause of action says that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of $332.50, for money had and received…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Field v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Boseker v. ChamberlainIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Spears v. WardIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Rush v. KelleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wayne Health & Accident Insurance v. WerkmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. ShirkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914