Legal Opinion
Atm Magfoor Rahman Sarkar v. Merrick Garland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 1, 2022No. 17-72212PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ATM MAGFOOR RAHMAN SARKAR; No. 17-72212 HASNA HENA RAHMAN; SAIQA RAHMAN; SAHRIAR RAHMAN, Agency Nos. Petitioners, A070-952-103 A070-952-104 v. A070-952-105 A070-952-107 MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. OPINION On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted March 10, 2022 Pasadena, California Filed July 1, 2022 Before: Sandra S. Ikuta, Kenneth K. Lee, and Danielle J. Forrest, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Forrest 2 SARKAR V. GARLAND SUMMARY * Immigration The…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Nshan Ayanian v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Singh v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Forbright Bank v. Contour PropCo 1735 S Mission, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
- Ingram v. MouserDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2023
- Martinez v. Booking Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2024
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.