Vandor Corp. v. Wilson
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
McKINNEY, District Judge.
This cause is now before the Court on defendants’, David K. Wilson, Molding Solutions, Inc. and Anderson Forest Products, Inc.’s (“AFP”) (the defendants collectively “Defendants”), motion for partial summary judgment on the patent infringe ment claims brought against them by the plaintiff, Vandor Corporation (“Vandor”). Vandor is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 5,897,075 (the “'075 patent”), that describes a reel assembly for supporting flexible materials. Vandor alleges that a product manufactured by AFP, the AFP…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chiron Corp. v. Genentech, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2002