Legal Opinion

Vandor Corp. v. Wilson

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided July 3, 2001No. IP 99-0946-C-M/SPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

McKINNEY, District Judge.

This cause is now before the Court on defendants’, David K. Wilson, Molding Solutions, Inc. and Anderson Forest Products, Inc.’s (“AFP”) (the defendants collectively “Defendants”), motion for partial summary judgment on the patent infringe ment claims brought against them by the plaintiff, Vandor Corporation (“Vandor”). Vandor is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 5,897,075 (the “'075 patent”), that describes a reel assembly for supporting flexible materials. Vandor alleges that a product manufactured by AFP, the AFP…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chiron Corp. v. Genentech, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API