Sappa v. Crestetto
California Court of Appeal
1DissentShinn, J.
I dissent. A point of disagreement with my associates is in the answer to the following question:
Where a creditor, without receiving any sum in payment, signed an ambiguous receipt of full payment under an ac*369knowledged liability to pay for services, which receipt did not purport to be a release, and the jury impliedly found upon sufficient evidence that a waiver of the creditor’s claim was not intended, should this court, upon appeal, from a consideration of the writing alone, construe it as a release and reverse the judgment to the extent of the amount which was owing to the creditor on the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lemm v. Stillwater Land & Cattle Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Enyart v. EnyartNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
- Nylund v. MadsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Lundberg v. KatzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.