Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sappa v. Crestetto

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1947No. Civ. No. 15333Published

1DissentShinn, J.

I dissent. A point of disagreement with my associates is in the answer to the following question:

Where a creditor, without receiving any sum in payment, signed an ambiguous receipt of full payment under an ac*369knowledged liability to pay for services, which receipt did not purport to be a release, and the jury impliedly found upon sufficient evidence that a waiver of the creditor’s claim was not intended, should this court, upon appeal, from a consideration of the writing alone, construe it as a release and reverse the judgment to the extent of the amount which was owing to the creditor on the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lemm v. Stillwater Land & Cattle Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Enyart v. EnyartNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Nylund v. MadsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Lundberg v. KatzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API