Legal Opinion
Invest Almaz v. Temple-Inland
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided November 22, 1999No. CV-97-374-JMPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Invest Almaz v . Temple-Inland CV-97-374-JM 11/22/99 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Invest Almaz v. Civil N o . 97-374-JM Temple-Inland Forest Products Corporation MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Defendant Temple-Inland Forest Products Corporation has requested that this Court allow a jury to decide Invest Almaz’s claim of unjust enrichment. See Def.’s Mem. (document n o . 60) at 1, 3. For the reasons set forth below, I deny Temple-Inland’s request. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38(a) guarantees that “[t]he right of trial by jury as declared by the Seventh Amendment to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Donald J. Look v. Ronald AmaralCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Pella Windows & Doors, Inc. v. FaraciSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- Michael Alan Crooker v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.