Moses v. Gingles

There are involved here three forty-acre tracts of land, two in the northeast quarter of section 26, and the third in the southeast quarter of that section. Appellant says they should haye been described in the notice of sale as follows:

“Southeast, northeast, southwest, northeast northeast, southeast, section 26.” Had this been done, it would have indicated not that three forty-acre tracts of land were being offered for sale, hut that two ten-acre tracts were described.

These tracts of land were separately assessed for taxation, as shown by the tax hooks, two of them at the same valuation, the…