Legal Opinion

Edgar Rundle v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 21, 1967No. 19797_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a companion case to Hinton et al. v. Udall, 124 U.S.App.D.C. 283, 364 F.2d 676 (1966), in which this court held that an attack on an order of the Secretary of the Interior restoring ownership of all mineral, oil and gas resources in certain so-called mineral strip lands in Arizona to the San Carlo Apache Tribe of Indians was unripe for adjudication. The District Court in Hinton 1 had held that, assuming the justiciability of the issue presented, the Secretary had authority under Section 3 2 of the Indian Reorganization Act to withdraw from entry and to restore the subsurface rights in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bowman v. UdallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1965
  2. S. Jack Hinton v. Stewart L. Udall, Individually and as Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co., Ltd., & Hugh Brown, United States of America v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co., Ltd., and Hugh BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  2. United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. State v. FenclWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. FenclWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API