Legal Opinion

Kirby v. Holliday Laundry & Dry Cleaners

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 2, 1957No. 17245PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stukes, Chief Justice.

In this case the employer and its insurance carrier have appealed from an award of workmen’s compensation to the respondent for permanent, partial disability and for dis figurement. The sole defense is the statute of limitations contained in Sec. 72-303 of the Code of 1952, which provides that right to compensation shall be forever barred unless a claim is filed with the Industrial Commission within one year after the accident or if death ensues, within one year thereafter. The section was amended in 1955 in a manner which is presently irrelevant. See 1956 Cumulative…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Young v. Sonoco Products Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  2. Wallace v. Campbell Limestone Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  3. Duncan v. Gaffney Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  4. Poole v. E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  5. Edge v. Dunean MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mauldin V. Dyna-Color/Jjack RabbitCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  2. Altman v. Williams Furniture Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  3. Altman v. Williams Furniture Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API