Legal Opinion
Mauldin V. Dyna-Color/Jjack Rabbit
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided December 10, 1990No. 1578PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Judge:
This is a workers’ compensation case. Virginia Gaynell Mauldin filed a claim with the South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Commission for a job-related injury to her knee. Her employer, Dyna Color/Jack Rabbit, contested the claim on the ground that it was barred by the two-year statute of limitations', Section 42-15-40, Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976. The single commissioner and a panel of the full commission found the claim was timely. Jack Rabbit sought judicial *327review in the circuit court, which affirmed the Commission’s order. Jack Rabbit appeals. We reverse.
On January…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dillon County School District Number Two v. Lewis Sheet Metal Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Cook v. MacK's Transfer & StorageCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Poole v. E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
- Fox v. UNION-BUFFALO MILLSSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
- Hopkins v. Floyd's WholesaleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mauldin v. Dyna-Color/Jack RabbitSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Mauldin v. Dyna-Color/Jack RabbitSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992