Legal Opinion
Stroshine v. Stroshine
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 1982No. 14003PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FEDERICI, Justice.
This case involves an appeal from the district court of Otero County. Originally consolidated with other similar cases in Whenry v. Whenry, 21 N.M.St.B.Bull. 882 (1982), this Court granted rehearing in order to review only the Stroshine case. The trial court ruled that, based upon McCarty v. McCarty, 453 U.S. 210, 101 S.Ct. 2728, 69 L.Ed.2d 589 (1981), Mr. Stroshine was entitled to relief from paying any portion of his disability retirement pay to Mrs. Stroshine. This Court held in Whenry, in accord with McCarty, that military nondisability retirement pay is the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. YazellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Laughlin v. LaughlinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Berry v. MeadowsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re Marriage of GooddingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- United States v. Itt Consumer Financial Corporation, and Aetna Finance Company, Delaware CorporationsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Mitchell v. MitchellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Mylette v. MyletteNew York Supreme Court · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.