Legal Opinion
Cornwell v. CIT Corp. of New York
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 25, 1974No. Civ. A. 2093-73PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
The instant action is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) on the grounds that there is lack of jurisdiction over one defendant and plaintiffs have failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted with respect to the remaining defendant. Defendants’ Motion raises two issues that concern, first, the jurisdictional reach of the long-arm statute of the District of Columbia, 13 D.C.Code § 13-423(a) (Supp. V., 1972) 1 and, second, the statute of limitations applicable to an action…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- n.sidney Nyhus v. Travel Management CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Manatee Cablevision Corp. v. PiersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
- Blair v. Norwegian Caribbean Lines, A/SDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985