Legal Opinion

In Re Svitojus' Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1941No. Docket No. 85, Calendar No. 40,917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs are residents of Lithuania, parents and heirs at law of Joseph Svitojus, deceased. Defendant John J. Smolenski is administrator of his estate. In May, 1936, Fred P. Geib, an attorney, entered into an arrangement with the Lithuanian consul representing plaintiffs to bring suit on their behalf to recover certain claimed assets of said estate. The attorney agreed with the consul to represent the claimed heirs as attorney and try their case, the consul to provide funds for necessary disbursements not to exceed $100. For the services of himself and one other, Mr. Geib and his associate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Michigan Trust Co. v. McNamaraMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Hillman v. SchwenkMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Svitojus v. KurantMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  4. In Re Shadley's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kurant v. Kent Probate JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Taylor v. LintMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. In Re Svitojus' EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. In Re FOWLER ESTATE; In Re FOWLER TRUSTMichigan Supreme Court · 2026
  5. Smolenski v. Kent Probate JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API