Legal Opinion

Henry v. Ford Motor Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1939No. Docket No. 152, Calendar No. 40,793PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, C. J.

The sole question in the present case is whether an employee who, after being engaged in light work which was given to him on account of his disabled condition and who, upon being laid off, was directed to apply for benefits under the Michigan unemployment compensation act (Act No. 1, Pub. Acts 1936 [Ex. Sess.], as amended by Act No. 347, Pub. Acts 1937, and by Act No. 324, Pub. Acts 1939) is precluded from obtaining compensation under the workmen’s compensation act for the same period during which he received unemployment benefits. Plaintiff received severe injuries to his left hand and arm…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harrington v. Department of Labor & IndustryMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Paschke v. Retool IndustriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. City of Duncan v. BinghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  3. Paschke v. Retool IndustriesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Winter v. Roberson Construction CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Edwards v. Metro Tile CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API