Legal Opinion

Brice v. Wood

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1986No. 85CA0739PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

The claimants, Robert E. Brice and Mt. Sneffles Company, appeal a judgment of the trial court dismissing their claims against the Estate of Marie Scott in which the court ruled that their claims were not timely filed and that it had no jurisdiction to consider them under § 15-12-803(2)(a), C.R.S. The claimants argue that their claims are excluded from the operation of that statute by § 15-10-201(6), C.R.S., or, alternatively, that if the claims are subject to § 15-12-803(2)(b), C.R.S., they were timely filed thereunder. We reverse and remand for consideration of the claims.

On…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Griswold v. HazardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
  3. Parchen v. ChessmanMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Matter of Estate of DaigleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  5. Estate of Randall v. Colorado State HospitalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Matter of Estate of ScottColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Armstrong v. ArmstrongDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1990
  3. Reistad v. BurmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. Reistad v. BurmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API