Legal Opinion
Lyon v. Thurston County
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided January 16, 2025No. 3:23-cv-05450Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 LEVI LYON, et al., 9 Plaintiffs, Case No. C23-5450-SKV 10 v. ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT 11 THURSTON COUNTY, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Before the Court are two motions for summary judgment. State Defendants1 argue 16 summary judgment is mandated here because the relevant and undisputed facts show Plaintiffs’ 17 claims each fail as a matter of law. Dkt. 43. Plaintiffs move for summary judgment on “all 18 causes of action and damages currently pending.” Dkt. 42 at 1. Being fully advised,2…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.