Legal Opinion

Wall v. Flack

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 23, 1972No. 7229SC48PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the record discloses that the plaintiff’s claim is barred by the running of the statute of limitations. G.S. 1-52(5). If so, defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law and summary judgment pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56, was appropriate. Brantley v. Dunstan, 10 N.C. App. 706, 179 S.E. 2d 878 (1971).

“ ‘The party moving for summary judgment has the burden of clearly establishing the lack of any triable issue of fact by the record properly before the court. His papers are carefully scrutinized; and those of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Lee v. ShorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Brantley v. DunstanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Liberty Loan Corp. of North Charlotte v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Holcomb v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API