Carmichael v. McGillivray
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, in the Fourteenth District Court, County of Placer. Reardan, J. Neither the complaint nor the answer contained any allegations in relation to the order in which the parcels of land should be sold. The other facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorrison, C. J.
This is a suit in equity to foreclose a mortgage on three separate and distinct parcels of land, situate in the county of Placer; and the mortgaged premises are described in the complaint as follows : “ All those claims known as the Dardanelles claims, situate near Forest Hill, and bounded on the north by Devil’s Canon, east by the Oro claims, south by the slope of the hill to the middle fork of the American River, and on the *9west by the Big Spring claims; also, the Oro mining claims, bounded on tbe north by Devil’s Canon, east by the Green Spring mining claims, south. by the slope of the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Bank of Ukiah v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- A.L. v. Pleasanton Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Brittany Ann Ingrassi v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023
- Monica O’Hara v. California Highway Patrol, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026