Ashby v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
Petitioners incurred indirect moving expenses and real estate selling expenses in connection with their move from Kansas City to San Francisco at the request of petitioner's employer, for which they were reimbursed by the employer. Held, the amounts received as reimbursements are not excludable from petitioners' gross income.
1Opinion of the Court
Richard J. Ashby and Klea C. Ashby v. Commissioner.
Ashby v. Commissioner
Docket No. 1159-68.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1969-238; 1969 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 55; 28 T.C.M. (CCH) 1242; T.C.M. (RIA) 69238;
November 10, 1969, Filed
Petitioners incurred indirect moving expenses and real estate selling expenses in connection with their move from Kansas City to San Francisco at the request of petitioner's employer, for which they were reimbursed by the employer. Held, the amounts received as reimbursements are not excludable from petitioners' gross income.
David H. Katz, 220 Montgomery, San Francisco,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- James J. Ritter v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Kenneth D. England and Connie J. England v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Ferebee v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
- McLellan v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
- Lull v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.