Legal Opinion

Kenneth D. England and Connie J. England v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 29, 1965No. 14727_1PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILEY, Circuit Judge.

This appeal by the Government from a judgment for a refund to plaintiffs 1 of income tax poses the issue whether England, taxpayer, must include in his gross income for 1960 an amount which he was reimbursed by his employer for certain expenses incurred, prior to gaining possession of new permanent quarters, incidental to a transfer to a new post in the employer’s interest; or alternatively, whether such amount, if includible in gross income, is a deductible travel or business expense. We think the district court erred in deciding this issue in favor of England.

The facts…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Leo C. Cockrell, and Carol P. Cockrell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  3. Courtney v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  4. Mendel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  5. Ney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Stubbs, Overbeck & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. Commissioner v. StidgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Robert Rosenspan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. BilzerianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Walter H. Mendel and Lillian Mendel, Walter H. Mendel and Lillian Mendel v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API