Legal Opinion

Brooklyn Audit Co. v. Department of Taxation & Finance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 1937PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

The resignation of the income tax examiner in the Department of Taxation and Finance during the pendency of charges brought pursuant to section 22 of the Civil Service Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 7) does not ter minate the proceeding. If the facts were that the only-result of the proceeding would be removal from office, and that nothing survived a resignation, then the latter might terminate the proceeding, a continuation of which would be futile. In the case at bar, however, if a person is removed from the civil service, as distinguished from resigning, he may be disqualified by the Civil Service…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. City School District of the City of New York v. McGrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Flynn v. State Ethics CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Flood v. MonaghanNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Borges v. McGuireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Whalen v. CorsiNew York Supreme Court · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API