(PS) Coleman v. County of Sacramento

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JACQUELINE COLEMAN, 2:23-cv-2677-DC-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Jacqueline Coleman proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis1 under

42 U.S.C. § 18

1983. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”) is before the court for screening under 28 19 U.S.C. § 1915(e). (ECF No. 16.) The court must screen every in forma pauperis proceeding and 20 must order dismissal of the case if it is “frivolous or malicious,” “fails to state a claim on which 21…