Legal Opinion

Sisk v. Randon

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 18, 1930No. 9433PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, J,

Appellants assail an adverse judgment whereby — pursuant to the return of an instructed verdict to that effect, notwithstanding their own claims of ownership thereof both as heirs of William and Millie Alston and under the three, five, and ten-year statutes of limitation — the learned trial court vested in the appellees the title to the easterly 50 acres, o'r river end, of the William and Millie Alston 100-acre homestead tract in the Alsbury league on the Bernard river in Bra-zoria county.

In the state of the record on appeal the controlling question presented here is whether or not…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Eylar v. EylarTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Kahn v. KahnTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Dunn v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Borden v. Trespalacios Rice & Irrigation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Love v. BreedloveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hubert v. Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2005
  2. McMurry v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Young v. RuddCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Hall v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Cooper v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API