Legal Opinion

Tyler v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 2005No. A-04-1418PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cassel, Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the court on Billy Tyler’s motion for summary reversal. For the reasons that (1) summary reversal pursuant to Neb. Ct. R. of Prac. 7C (rev. 2001) is not proper in this case because there is no stipulation of the parties, (2) Tyler is incarcerated and has waived oral argument, and (3) Nebraska’s Department of Correctional Services (Department) declined to file a brief, precluding it from presenting oral argument, we order this case submitted without oral argument pursuant to this court’s authority under Neb. Ct. R. of Prac. 11B(1) (rev. 2000).…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. White v. PearlmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  2. Harold Eugene Free v. R.D. Miles, Warden, Fci BastropCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. Kellogg v. Nebraska Department of Correctional ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Farm Credit Services of America v. American State BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  5. State v. TexelNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tyler v. HoustonNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Castonguay v. RetelsdorfNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State Ex Rel. Tyler v. HoustonNebraska Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Tyler v. NatvigNebraska Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State v. AndersonNebraska Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API