Legal Opinion
Tyler v. Houston
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 2007No. S-07-101PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.
The issue in this original action for writ of habeas corpus is whether the time that Billy R. Tyler was free on bond, pursuant to an order of the district court granting a writ of habeas corpus, should be credited against the sentence that Tyler was required to complete after the district court’s order was reversed on appeal.
BACKGROUND
The petitioner, Tyler, is an inmate committed to the custody of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services (the Department). Robert R Houston, the director of the Department, is the respondent in this action in his official capacity.
Tyler was convicted in…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Anderson v. CorallSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- White v. PearlmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- United States v. Frank MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Hudspeth v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Donald L. Hayward v. United States Parole Commission, Joseph Petrovsky, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Anderson v. HoustonNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- Meyer v. FrakesNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. JacksonNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- Carmicheal v. RollinsNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
- Poindexter v. HoustonNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.