Legal Opinion

People v. Wilson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 2005PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered, to be preceded by an independent source hearing. *

The People’s eyewitness identified defendant in a pretrial lineup, which occurred almost immediately after a police officer had shown him defendant’s photograph. Prior to trial, defendant moved to suppress the eyewitness’s lineup identification, as well as his prospective in-court identification testimony. At the suppression hearing, Supreme Court denied defendant’s motion, finding the lineup identification untainted by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BurtsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. DelamotaNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. The People v. Kaity MarshallNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. People v. GragnanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. People v. HamdamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API