Legal Opinion

Crisman v. McMurray

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1901PublishedCited by 11 opinions

PROM SHELBY. Appeal from Chancery Court of Shelby County. F. H. Heiskell, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

This is a suit in equity between partners for a settlement of a co-partnership in buying and selling cotton at Memphis. The complainant sought a large recovery against the defendant and demanded a trial by jury. Giving effect to the verdict, the Chancellor pronounced a decree in favor of the defendant and against the complainant for $4,143.56. Complainant appealed.

At the threshold of our investigation we encounter an error in practice for which the decree must be reversed. That error consists in the submission and trial of one hundred and ninety-one (191) so-called issues, presenting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whitney v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  2. McElya v. HillTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Railroad v. LeeTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Cheatham v. Pearce & RyanTennessee Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Watkins v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Godbee v. DimickCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  3. Third Nat. Bank v. American Equitable Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
  4. De Rossett Hat Co. v. London Lancashire Fire Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. v. BoydTennessee Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API