Legal Opinion

International Harvester Co. v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 31, 2000No. A00A0471PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

International Harvester Company1 (“International”) appeals from a jury verdict in favor of George Cunningham on his claim for injuries he received when a crank handle broke off a disc harrow and hit him in the face. On appeal, International contends that the trial court: (1) abused its discretion when it refused to compel Cunningham to produce the crank handle for an expert inspection; (2) erred when it admitted surgical photographs into evidence; and (3) erred when it denied International’s motion for a mistrial based on Cunningham’s closing arguments.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  4. Reeves v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Parks v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Resurgens, P.C. v. ElliottSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  3. Kesterson v. JarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  4. Eagle Jets, LLC. v. Atlanta Jet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  5. INFINITE ENERGY, INC. v. CottrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API