Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Twitter, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 2021No. A158214Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 1/22/21 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE MEGHAN MURPHY, Plaintiff and Appellant, A158214 v. (San Francisco City & County TWITTER, INC., et al., Super. Ct. No. CGC-19-573712) Defendants and Respondents. When Meghan Murphy posted several messages critical of transgender women on Twitter, the company took down her posts and informed her she had violated its hateful conduct rules. After she posted additional similar messages, Twitter permanently suspended her account. Murphy filed suit, alleging causes…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Doe v. MySpace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  3. Baral v. SchnittCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Kenneth M. Zeran v. America Online, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  5. Fair Housing Coun., San Fernando v. Roommates. ComCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API