Legal Opinion

People v. Flowers

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 18, 1989No. 1-86-2441Published

1Opinion

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION UPON REHEARING

2Opinion of the CourtJustice Buckley

In granting the State’s petition for rehearing, we granted the State leave to raise an additional issue of whether the Reddick error was harmless in light of the felony-murder charge. We file this supplemental opinion to address this issue.

On rehearing, the State argues that we erred in vacating defendant’s murder conviction because the Reddick murder and manslaughter instruction error is irrelevant to defendant’s murder conviction, since a valid conviction for armed robbery necessarily means defendant is guilty of felony murder. Before addressing the merits…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. People v. HickmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. WashingtonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. People v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API