Legal Opinion

Siewing v. Pearson Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1987No. 86-526PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gulbrandson

Pearson Company, defendant and appellant, appeals the denial of a motion to set aside a default judgment entered against it in the District Court of the Seventeenth Judicial District, County of Valley. We affirm.

David and Arnold Siewing, respondents, purchased a seed cleaning machine from Pearson Co. in April 1985. Siewings were dissatisfied with the performance of the machine. The screen through which the seed passed was allegedly warped, causing the seed to spill uncontrollably out of the machine. Siewings contacted Pearson Co. and voiced their dissatisfaction. Pearson Co. offered to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lords v. NewmanMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Foster Apiaries, Inc. v. Hubbard Apiaries, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Griffin v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. First Nat. Bank of Cut Bank v. SpringsMontana Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Blume v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re Marriage of WincklerMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. D.G.M., Inc. v. Cremeans Concrete & Supply Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Myers v. All West TransportMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In Re the Marriage of McDonaldMontana Supreme Court · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API