Manske v. UPS Cartage Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge.
Concluding that the complaints of a trucking company employee to the company about the condition of its trucks may constitute protected conduct under the Surface Transportation Assistance Act, the Court denies the employer’s motion for summary judgment.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
A. Procedural Background
On July 30, 2010, Dennis Manske filed a complaint against UPS Cartage Services, Inc. (Cartage), alleging that Cartage violated the Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA), the Maine Human Rights Act (MHRA), and the Maine…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Robert Goldman v. First National Bank of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Carroll v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Triangle Trading Co. v. Robroy Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Brock v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ayotte v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2013
- Stark v. Hartt Transportation Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2014