Legal Opinion

Seger v. Drews

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 28, 1989No. A 8711-06950; CA A60405PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Plaintiffs appeal a summary judgment granted to defendant on their claim for damages to their real property. They argue that the court erred in holding that there was an accord and satisfaction as a matter of law. We reverse.

Because a summary judgment was granted to defendant, we view the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiffs and determine whether summary judgment was proper as a matter of law. Seeborg v. General Motors Corporation, 284 Or 695, 699, 588 P2d 1100 (1978). Defendant, an adjoining landowner, entered plaintiffs’ property and cut down several trees to improve the view…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Reppert & Co. v. Plaid Pantries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fiedler v. BowlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API