Legal Opinion

Estate of Naftzger

California Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1944No. L. A. 18824PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

This appeal presents the question of whether on the hearing of a petition to confirm a sale of real property of a decedent’s estate the probate court is authorized by section 785 of the Probate Code (hereinafter quoted) to confirm a sale to a new bidder for a price which is “ten per cent more in amount than that named in the return [petition] ” but is not 10 per cent more than such amount plus expenses of sale. We have concluded that such increased price may properly be accepted and the sale to the new bidder forthwith confirmed.

Eespondent Fred E. Naftzger, as the duly appointed and qualified…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gossman v. GossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. In re the Estate of PearsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Estate of BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Estate of FlahertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. In Re Estate of ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of GreerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Estate of ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Colby v. FlournoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Parker v. OwenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Aberle v. SchafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API