Legal Opinion
Loverich v. Warner Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 24, 1940No. 145PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, District Judge.
This suit was instituted by a libel in admiralty seeking (1) indemnity and (2) maintenance and cure on account of personal injuries allegedly suffered by libellant, a maritime worker, during the course of his employment. Trial was by the court without a jury.
It appears that Frank B. Loverich, the libellant, was employed in 1925 as master of the all-steel oil barge O — 1, by the Hainesport Mining & Transportation Co., the assets of which were transferred in 1929 to an associated company, the Van Sciver Corporation; in the same year, 1929, these combined assets were…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Pacific Steamship Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- The Bouker No. 2Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kane v. Union of Soviet Socialist RepublicsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Sawyer v. California Tanker CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
- Arthur v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003