Legal Opinion
Carroll v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 8, 1999No. 2-95-467-CR, 2-95-468-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
DAVID RICHARDS, Justice.
Pursuant to Rule 50, we have reconsidered our prior opinion upon the State’s petition for discretionary review. Tex. R.App. P. 50. We withdraw our opinion and judgment on remand of August 31, 1999 and substitute the following in its place.
In compliance with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ general order remanding these cases, we revisit the question of whether the trial court erred when it required appellant to testify against her will at the sentencing portion of her guilty plea hearing.
On original submission, we…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Glenn Tony Birdsong II v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- Lucero v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
- Arnoldo Ruiz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.