Legal Opinion

King Drug Co of Florence Inc v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 26, 2015No. 14-1243PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal from the grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a rule-of- reason claim under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), we are asked to determine whether FTC v. Actavis, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2223, 186 L.Ed.2d 343 (2013), covers, in addition to reverse cash payments, a settlement in which the paten-tee drug manufacturer agrees to relinquish its right to produce an “authorized generic” of the drug (“no-AG agreement”) to compete with a first-filing generic’s drug during the generic’s…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Schuchardt v. President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  2. In Re Lipitor Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. AbbVie IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  4. In Re Wellbutrin XL Antitrust Litigation Indirect Purchaser ClassCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  5. In Re Lipitor Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API