King Drug Co of Florence Inc v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal from the grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a rule-of- reason claim under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), we are asked to determine whether FTC v. Actavis, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2223, 186 L.Ed.2d 343 (2013), covers, in addition to reverse cash payments, a settlement in which the paten-tee drug manufacturer agrees to relinquish its right to produce an “authorized generic” of the drug (“no-AG agreement”) to compete with a first-filing generic’s drug during the generic’s…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Schuchardt v. President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- In Re Lipitor Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Federal Trade Commission v. AbbVie IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- In Re Wellbutrin XL Antitrust Litigation Indirect Purchaser ClassCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- In Re Lipitor Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.