Legal Opinion

The Ohio

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 9, 1898No. 549PublishedCited by 27 opinions

. Cross' Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the '¡¡Eastern District of'Michigan. This is a collision case. The steamer Ohio, bound v. Mud Lake, coal laden, and having in tow the schooner Sheldon, came into collision with the steamer Siberia, bound down Mud Lake, and was so injured as to almost immediately sink in 33 feet of water. The Siberia was the colliding vessel, and sustained but a slight injury.

Read the full summary

. Cross' Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the '¡¡Eastern District of'Michigan. This is a collision case. The steamer Ohio, bound v. Mud Lake, coal laden, and having in tow the schooner Sheldon, came into collision with the steamer Siberia, bound down Mud Lake, and was so injured as to almost immediately sink in 33 feet of water. The Siberia was the colliding vessel, and sustained but a slight injury. This collision occurred between the Can buoy and the entrance of the river St. Marys into Mud Lake. The Ohio sighted the propellers Siberia and Mather just as she was east…

1Opinion of the CourtLurton, Circuit Judge

It is indisputable that the cause of this collision was the departure of the Siberia from the course she was on when about to pass the Ohio. An agreement to pass port to port had been established. If the Ohio and Siberia had each kept their then respective courses, they would have passed each other at a distance of 600 or 700 feet apart: This establishes a prima facie case of negligence against the Siberia, for this sudden change of course was the immediate cause of the collision. If this swing from her course was caused wholly by the wrongful approach of the Mather, and could not have been…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. The City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. The UmbriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Hall & Long v. Railroad Cos.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. The Elizabeth JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Union Oil Company of California v. The Tug Mary Malloy, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Seaboard Airline R. Co. v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co. The Pan MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  3. The MesabaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1901
  4. The AustraliaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
  5. The FontanaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API