The Dean Richmond
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge.
We agree with the conclusions of fact and law expressed in the opinion of the learned district judge who decided this cause in the court below respecting the negligence of the steamboat. 103 Fed. 701. He was of the opinion that, unless the libelant’s canal boat was not in a proper place, a presumption of negligence arose against 1he steamboat from the fact of a collision with a moored vessel, and imposed upon her the burden of exonerating herself by exculpatory facts, and that the evidence did not meet the burden thus imposed upon her. It is-unnecessary *1002to recapitulate…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The CanimaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
- The Martino CilentoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1885
- The CincinnatiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1899
- The EtruriaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1898
- The Dean RichmondDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1900
3Cited by12 opinions
- DepewCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
- The New York Central No. 18Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Wright & Cobb Lighterage Co. v. New England Navigation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1911
- The AllemaniaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Flannery v. National Coal & Ice Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.