Legal Opinion

Pryal v. Pryal

California Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1903No. S. F. No. 2427Published

APPEAL from Superior Court, Alameda County; F. B. Ogden, Judge. ' Action by Andrew D. Pryal against William A. Pryal. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

Action to quiet title to two separate pieces of real estate situate in Alameda county. Plaintiff had judgment and defendant appeals from the judgment on the judgment-roll.

*1351. In November, 1867, plaintiff resided with his wife, Mary A. Pryal, upon the first piece of property described in the complaint, and on said day he made in due form a declaration of homestead thereon, which was duly recorded. At the time of making the declaration the property was community property, and it will be hereafter called the homestead. In the year 1879 the plaintiff, by deed of gift, signed by himself…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burkett v. BurkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Brown v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. In re Estate of LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Manning v. DallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Peiser v. GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API