Legal Opinion

in the Matter of J.P., a Juvenile

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2004No. 03-0266PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brister

in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice HECHT, Justice OWEN, Justice O’NEILL, Justice JEFFERSON, Justice SCHNEIDER and Justice SMITH joined.

The trial court modified a prior juvenile order to commit J.P., an eleven-year-old boy, to the Texas Youth Commission (TYC). He appeals, arguing the trial court failed to make certain findings during modification that the statute expressly requires only in original commitment orders. We granted the petition because of a conflict in the courts of appeals on this question. We hold the plain words of the statute do not require the explicit findings J.P.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In re M.A.L.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. In re H.G.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. In re L.R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  5. In re D.R.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. In re of J.R.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. In re S.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Adams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
  4. In re A.D.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  5. In re J.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API