Legal Opinion

Lindquist v. Johnson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1900Published

Appeal from circuit court, Roberts county. Hon. A. W. Campbell, Judge. Attachment by A. W. Lindquist against Otto T. Johnson and another. From an order vacating the writ on motion, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

This is an appeal from an order discharging an attachment. The affidavit upon which the warrant of attachment was issued states, as the grounds of the attachment, “that defendants have assigned, disposed of, and secreted a portion of their property, with intent to defraud their creditors; and that said defendants are about to dispose of, assign, and secrete the balance of their property, with intent to defraud their creditors; and also that said debt was incurred for property obtained under false pretenses.” A motion was made on the part of the defendants to vacate, set aside, and discharge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rich v. BowkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Dumay v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  3. Tucker v. FrederickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  4. Hornick Drug Co. v. LaneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Jones v. MeyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API